The Pope Leo AJC meeting on October 22 centered on a proposition that should be easier to apply than it apparently is: deep disagreement does not excuse prejudice. Welcoming American Jewish Committee representatives at the Vatican, Leo XIV urged cooperation between Jews and Catholics and rejected religious and ethnic hatred. The audience supplies a specific new occasion for that message.

Vatican News reports that Leo linked the relationship to defending human dignity, helping the poor, religious freedom, justice and peace. He recalled John Paul II’s contribution to Jewish-Catholic friendship and the continuing importance of dialogue. He also reaffirmed the Church’s opposition to antisemitism. These are the themes of the address, not a claim that the meeting resolved every political or theological difference.

Our take: the difficult part of interfaith respect begins precisely where agreement ends. People do not need a special diplomatic framework to be pleasant about something they already support. The test is whether a dispute becomes permission to treat an entire religious or ethnic community as a target. That shortcut may be popular online, but popularity is not a moral argument.

There is room to examine governments, institutions, leaders and policies sharply while recognizing that individuals do not inherit collective guilt from an identity. Specific criticism can be checked against evidence. Group hostility replaces that work with a label, then congratulates itself for having simplified a complicated situation. The simplification is usually the problem.

The practical measure of an audience like this comes after the photograph: whether relationships support cooperation, whether discrimination is challenged consistently and whether the message is applied when it inconveniences one’s own side. A meeting is an opportunity for that work. It is not a receipt proving the work has already been completed.

The accompanying photograph is archival and does not depict the October 22 delegation. The current story is the audience and Leo’s stated rejection of hatred amid disagreement. Readers can assess that message on its own terms without pretending that friendship requires uniform opinions. Apparently adults may disagree without assigning an entire population the role of villain. Someone should forward the memo.

Sources and photograph

Vatican News, October 22 audience coverage. OSV News, October 22 meeting report.

Archival June 2025 photograph; not the October 22 audience with American Jewish Committee leaders. Photo: Gobierno de la República Argentina / Argentine State portal; CC BY 4.0. Display copy resized. Where applicable, the resized photograph retains the stated ShareAlike license. Original photograph and rights record. Image-use terms.

More from this Daily Junk Food section.

THE JUNK FOOD TAKE

Facts first. Side-eye included.

DJF separates what is confirmed from what is claimed—and tells you why this particular mess is worth your time.

Illustrated portrait of Daily Junk Food columnist Dana Side-Eye
YOUR COLUMNIST

Dana Side-Eye

Receipts, Rumors & Internet Nonsense

Dana reads the fine print, checks the timeline, and keeps one eyebrow permanently raised. She covers viral claims, internet pile-ons, and suspiciously convenient explanations.

“Screenshots are forever. So is the side-eye.”