Opinion · October 25, 2026

The remarkable thing about Emily Osment asking for an intimacy coordinator should be how unremarkable the request is. Actors work with choreography, lighting and safety planning. Planning how intimate scenes will work belongs in that professional conversation, not in a separate category labeled “please do not make this awkward.”

What Osment described

People reported October 25 on Osment’s account in a new Young Sheldon oral history. She described requesting a coordinator because co-star Montana Jordan was 18 when she joined at 29. A coordinator attended later scenes. The account concerns earlier filming, not an incident alleged to have occurred this week, and does not allege misconduct by Jordan.

That last distinction matters. A request for a professional safeguard is not an accusation against a scene partner. Turning it into one would punish the very kind of straightforward communication productions should encourage.

Boundaries are part of doing the job

The public sometimes acts as though performers surrender ordinary workplace expectations when they accept a role. They do not. A scene can be fictional while the people executing it have real questions about comfort, coordination and what has been agreed.

Good preparation can make difficult work easier without implying that disaster was inevitable. Nobody assumes a stunt coordinator proves an actor was about to behave badly. An intimacy coordinator should be understood with the same basic seriousness: a professional supporting a planned performance.

The real story is the conversation

Google Trends’ U.S. Trending Now page listed Emily Osment among active surges when checked October 25. Rising interest does not justify inventing an on-set feud or treating an age difference between adult performers as proof of wrongdoing.

Our take is that Osment’s request sounds sensible. Hollywood should make it easy for people to raise practical concerns before a scene, without first producing a scandal large enough to justify the meeting. A professional boundary is not diva behavior. It is part of the work. The entertainment industry could save itself considerable embarrassment by remembering that before the oral history comes out.

Explore more Daily Junk Food coverage and the complete story archive.

Photo: Kevin Paul / CC BY 4.0. Resized and padded for display; photograph content unchanged.

THE JUNK FOOD TAKE

Facts first. Side-eye included.

DJF separates what is confirmed from what is claimed—and tells you why this particular mess is worth your time.