The U.S. Court of International Trade is hearing a challenge to President Donald Trump's tariffs on goods from 60 trading partners, imposed under a forced-labor rationale after the Supreme Court restricted his earlier tariff strategy. When the first legal key stops turning, apparently the executive branch simply checks beneath the couch cushions for another one.
The tariffs range from 10% to 12.5% and cover more than 99% of U.S. imports. Four small businesses and 25 Democratic-led states argue that the administration exceeded its authority and failed to conduct the investigations required by law.
The dispute follows a major Supreme Court loss
In February, the Supreme Court limited the president's ability to use emergency powers for sweeping tariffs. The administration then relied on different statutes, contending that foreign governments had failed to prevent forced labor in supply chains.
Forced labor is a real and serious trade issue. The challengers say the administration used it as a pretext to recreate a broad tariff program rather than tailoring penalties to documented abuses, products or countries after proper investigations.
A three-judge panel will decide what the statutes permit
The consolidated case is being heard in New York by judges appointed by presidents of both parties. A written opinion will follow after arguments.
The administration maintains that sufficient investigations occurred and that the tariffs respond to labor violations affecting American trade. The businesses and states counter that Congress never handed the president a nearly universal import-tax button with “forced labor” written across the top.
Reuters reported the September 30, 2026 hearing and the consolidated challenges.
The court does not have to minimize forced labor to reject an unlimited tariff theory. It must decide whether the administration followed the law it invoked—an oddly durable expectation, even in the reboot season.
Facts first. Side-eye included.
DJF separates what is confirmed from what is claimed—and tells you why this particular mess is worth your time.
Dana Side-Eye
Receipts, Rumors & Internet NonsenseDana reads the fine print, checks the timeline, and keeps one eyebrow permanently raised. She covers viral claims, internet pile-ons, and suspiciously convenient explanations.
“Screenshots are forever. So is the side-eye.”